![]() Up next is exploring the plugins that are available to extend the existing functionality. Other than the above, I'm quite happy to have made the switch today. It would be cool if there was a way to clean the history of such unnecessary entries so that it'd be easier to work with the history list. This includes actions that don't result in any change or sets of actions that together don't result in a change e.g. Lightroom keeps a history of every action you take. And the last feature is more of a nice-to-have.That tool is incredible for removing distracting elements from my shots - there always seems to be a branch or blade of grass to distract from the main subject in my photos! One big feature for Lightroom that would bring my use of Photoshop close to 0 is content-aware fill.I fall in the second camp and I'm not entirely sure what I'll end up doing to get the same results I was able to get with Photoshop. The second is that Lightroom should have soft-proofing. The first is that you shouldn't need soft-proofing. If you read the various posts on the web about this you'll get two points of view. Lightroom doesn't have any soft-proofing capabilities like Photoshop does.After some digging around I learned that you just need to grab one of the crop anchors and move it until the crop rectangle “flips” and then you're good to go. How you do this in Lightroom isn't readily apparent, but it can be done. Sometimes you want to use a fixed ratio portrait crop on a landscape photo. Scott covers cropping extensively, but misses one detail.Unfortunately, There are a few things that are missing both from Scott's book and from Lightroom: When I'm done post-processing a set of images I'm able to export all them to a folder with a file naming convention that auto-increments, dimensions of my choosing, and output sharpening specific to the image's final use. White balance adjusting, color enhancing, sharpening, cropping, rotating, and spot healing are all available and all non-destructive. With Lightroom 5, most of my wishes have come true. I also wanted more flexibility with exporting files with different dimensions and intended for different devices (screen vs.Adobe Bridge had some image management features, but I wanted better ones that made it easier to find photos.Some spot healing, rotation, and cropping didn't even come close to tapping into Photoshop's feature set so I'm adding a lot of unnecessary overhead to my workflow. Photoshop is really overkill for what I do. ![]() A lot of the editing I do in Photoshop actually changes the image OR requires me to jump through hoops to make them non-destructive. ![]() I've been pretty happy with the combination, but there are limitations that I wish I didn't have to deal with. And I'm glad I did!įor years I've been using a combination of Adobe Bridge plus Camera Raw plus Photoshop. So when I got a new computer about a month ago, it was time to give the program another shot. I had been thinking of moving to Lightroom for quite some time, but when I tried the demo a while back, my computer was too slow to handle the sort of non-destructive edits that made Lightroom useful. ![]() I just spent literally the whole day reading Scott Kelby's Lightroom for Digital Photographers (now version 5).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |